[ad_1]
In a judgment on Thursday, Mr Justice Andrew Baker, who heard the case with Lord Justice Holroyde and Mr Justice Garnham, mentioned: “We’re happy that when the appellant’s being pregnant and its particular attendant penalties and dangers, for the appellant and her unborn child, are added to the opposite private mitigation accessible to the appellant, there are distinctive circumstances referring to the appellant and her specific offence that, taken collectively, render it unjust to impose a custodial time period of at the least 5 years.
[ad_2]
Source link