[ad_1]
True that the EBS per se doesn’t abolish the black cash tradition in India. Even when there was EBS, different doubtful transactions did prevail. Due to this fact, the criticism that the judgment would revive the movement of black cash is clearly unfounded. To curb black cash, we want radical measures and political will. No courtroom verdict can ever substitute a political course of.
Electoral reforms are also a part of bigger political reforms and subsequently the Supreme Courtroom verdict must be taken ahead politically. It’s important to eradicate the movement of massive cash by way of public funding of elections in a believable approach which, nevertheless, shouldn’t burden the taxpayer disproportionally. Within the age of superior digital services for communication, spending an excessive amount of on elections is a sinful luxurious.
The considerations on the prevailing system of digital voting machines (EVM) additionally needs to be instantly addressed and resolved. There’s a have to additional regulate the influx of overseas funds by strict implementation of the Overseas Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) by clearing the loopholes. It is usually necessary to know that the quid professional quo phenomenon shouldn’t be restricted to EBS. The nation wants everlasting vigilance towards the unholy nexus between the political energy centres and the capital. Elections are important in a democracy. However we additionally have to democratise the elections. That may occur solely with the political training of the voters.
Kaleeswaram Raj
Lawyer, Supreme Courtroom of India
[ad_2]
Source link
