[ad_1]
New Delhi: Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray on Tuesday challenged Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and Meeting Speaker Rahul Narwekar to a public debate on which faction is the “actual Shiv Sena”. The event comes a day after Thackeray-led Sena group moved the Supreme Court docket in opposition to Narwekar’s verdict that said Shinde-led faction was the “actual Shiv Sena”.
Addressing a press convention in Mumbai, Thackeray stated, “Now we have moved the Supreme Court docket in opposition to the judgment given by these fraud folks. I problem Rahul Narvekar and (Eknath) Shinde to look earlier than folks and reply the query of the actual Shiv Sena. If I used to be not Shiv Sena chief, why did BJP take my signature for assist in 2014 and 2019 after Lok Sabha elections?”
In the meantime, slamming the transfer, Maharashtra Speaker Narwekar stated his verdict was primarily based on Supreme Court docket tips.
“On tenth January, I learn the judgment on disqualification of MLAs. For the final six days, some political leaders and staff have been deceptive folks about my judgment. Shiv Sena (UBT) is utilizing derogatory language in opposition to me. They do not even respect the Meeting Speaker. It is actually dangerous to the democratic construction,” information company ANI quoted Narwekar as saying.
“Supreme courtroom by no means stated that appointment of Bharat Gogawale as whip of Shinde faction was fallacious. Supreme Court docket stated that the Speaker should recognise the actual Shiv Sena. As a result of I obtained claims from either side, I gave my judgment based on the Supreme Court docket order,” Speaker Narwekar additional stated.
Alleging CM Shinde of “unconstitutionally usurping energy”, Shiv Sena (UBT) faction moved the highest courtroom in opposition to the Speaker’s ruling on Monday.
“The steadiness of comfort is in favour of the petitioner and in opposition to the respondents. Eknath Shinde has unconstitutionally usurped energy and is heading an unconstitutional Authorities in Maharashtra. That is extraordinarily prejudicial and inflicting irreparable hurt and harm to the petitioner, in addition to to most of the people,” their plea talked about, as reported by information company PTI.
[ad_2]
Source link
