[ad_1]
The suitable wing’s obsession with attacking mega pop star Taylor Swift has prompted the Division of Protection to make an official assertion refuting one of many extra egregious items of misinformation being unfold: that Swift is part of a “deep state” authorities conspiracy to swing the 2024 election to President Joe Biden.
Division spokesperson Sabrina Singh informed Politico, “We all know all too effectively the risks of conspiracy theories, so to set the file straight—Taylor Swift is just not a part of a DOD psychological operation. Interval.”
Singh’s latest assertion follows weeks of right-wingers throughout the nation catching the vapors over Swift efficiently encouraging her fanbase to register to vote. Conservative terror round Swift has reached such intense ranges that pundits have begun pushing the preposterous idea that Swift was groomed by our secret intelligence companies after which in some way became probably the most profitable musical act on the earth, simply in time to cease Donald Trump from turning into president once more. (And she’s going to supposedly do that whereas additionally rigging the Tremendous Bowl so her boyfriend’s group will win!)
Whereas the final psyop idea has been round for a while, the elevated media din round it may be traced instantly again to Fox Information backside feeder Jesse Watters, who boosted the inane “idea” throughout a January section on Swift.
“It’s actual. The Pentagon psy-op unit pitched NATO on turning Taylor Swift into an asset for combating misinformation on-line,” Watters stated.
An nameless Biden administration official informed Politico that this idea’s unfold among the many MAGA devoted is weird sufficient in its personal proper.
“The absurdity of all of it boggles the thoughts,” the official stated, then joked, “Is that this Crew Trump’s new Comet Ping-Pong pizzagate?” One other official reportedly laughed all through his dialog with the reporter, saying, “I actually can’t imagine this can be a factor.”
DoD officers have fielded so many questions on this harebrained idea that they’ve been pressured to make a number of statements, although they’ve severe jobs coping with severe issues. “I imply, I really like Taylor Swift, in fact, however I haven’t spent greater than two minutes fascinated by this,” one other senior official informed the information outlet.
In the meantime, Fox Information and the precise wing appear hell-bent on radicalizing Swift, who has spent most of her profession avoiding huge political statements. The musician has not often endorsed candidates (although she did endorse Joe Biden in 2020). She additionally backed Phil Bredesen, a former Democratic governor of Tennessee who ran for Senate towards Marsha Blackburn in 2018 (and misplaced). Bredesen informed Newsweek that her endorsement wasn’t even a deliberate factor; he discovered about it throughout an interview with one other reporter.
Since then, Swift’s largest sin has been selling voter registration—very efficiently.
There are probably myriad the reason why Swift stresses out these conservatives so acutely, however claiming she is a few psyop pawn and accusing her of being an environmental hypocrite are the form of issues that even a megastar might take personally. Swift may even get offended and inform her followers how she feels about these that assault profitable girls for selling democracy, or Trump allies who vow to wage a “holy conflict” towards her.
However not earlier than she beats Vegas’ Tremendous Bowl unfold after which stands on the 50-yard line, appears instantly into the digicam and, as a substitute of claiming she’s going to Disney World, instructions you to vote blue!
EMILY’s Checklist has been dedicated to electing pro-choice Democratic girls for 40 years, a mission that is grown solely extra important because the fall of Roe. Becoming a member of us on “The Downballot” this week is Christina Reynolds, one in every of EMILY’s high officers, to inform us about how her group recruits, helps, and advises girls candidates in any respect ranges of the poll nationwide. Reynolds explains the distinctive challenges girls face, from an absence of fundraising networks to judgments about their {qualifications} that by no means appear to stay to males. She tells us how Dobbs has—and hasn’t—modified campaigning for EMILY’s endorsees and spotlights a variety of key races the group is concerned on this yr.
Marketing campaign Motion
[ad_2]
Source link
