Orbán’s EU presidency: ‘We’ll just have to pinch our noses’

“Hungary has been repeatedly criticised for its erosion of the rule of legislation, and particularly after Hungary’s actions to disrupt the decision-making of the member states within the December EUCO [EU summit], we imagine that the time has come for the European Parliament to take motion,” Sarvamaa’s petition to fellow MEPs stated.

The “disruption” refers to Orbán’s veto on EU funding for Ukraine so as to strong-arm the EU into unfreezing all the EU funds for Hungary that have been beforehand held again resulting from rule-of-law considerations.

The EU Parliament and European Fee already launched an identical process to exclude Orbán from the EU Council in 2018 below Article 7(1) of the EU treaty.

This continues to rumble on contained in the Council, with occasional debates, however it has by no means gone ahead as a result of it lacks the consensus it must go forward.

However for Sarvamaa, who’s in control of EU budgetary affairs for the centre-right EPP group, the brand new course of has extra possibilities of success as a result of it could invoke the much less onerous Article 7(2) of the treaty as an alternative.

“Article 7(2) is a process to state the existence of a severe and protracted breach of values,” he advised EUobserver.

“After stating the existence of this severe and protracted breach of values (voted unanimously within the Council), it’s attainable for the member states to go for the suspension of sure membership rights (voted by certified majority within the Council),” he added.

MEPs additionally voted in a non-binding decision final June to droop Orbán’s upcoming EU Council presidency, which is because of begin in July.

And despite the fact that this fell on deaf ears within the Council, Sarvamaa stated the brand new marketing campaign may yield the identical desired outcome.

“If Hungary have been to be disadvantaged of its proper to vote within the Council, it could be fairly clear that Hungary wouldn’t have the ability to maintain the following presidency of the EU,” he stated.

“If the petition is supported throughout social gathering traces and there may be clear help among the many MEPs, I see no purpose why the European Parliament mustn’t act rapidly,” he added.

Sarvamaa’s attraction comes after EU Council chairman Charles Michel stated he would step down early to run as an MEP.

And this might turbocharge Orbán’s EU-presidency position by seeing him take over Michel’s duties in talking on behalf of the EU on the world stage till a long-term EU Council chairman alternative is appointed.

“That will solely underline the significance of the petition,” Sarvamaa stated.

‘Grave hazard’

Not one of the Hungarian MEPs from Orbán’s social gathering replied to EUobserver’s questions.

Márton Gyöngyösi, from the right-wing Jobbik opposition social gathering in Hungary, stated: “A majority of MEPs would additionally say that … the thought of him [Orbán] main the Council, taking up the EU presidency, or representing the EU in any kind is a grave hazard.”

However wanting on the EU’s observe report on Orbán, Gyöngyösi added: “There’s nice confusion as to what the technique must be to counter him”.

“How is it attainable to ponder any sanctions towards him when the EU simply launched €10bn to fund Mr Orbán’s intolerant venture? The EU isn’t solely dropping credibility however making itself look ridiculous within the course of,” he added.

Join EUobserver’s day by day e-newsletter

All of the tales we publish, despatched at 7.30 AM.

By signing up, you conform to our Phrases of Use and Privateness Coverage.

Petras Austrevicius, a Lithuanian MEP from the liberal Renew Europe group, additionally stated: “I do not assume there’s any authorized means to realize this nice objective [Orbán sanctions]”.

“It will not be simple to realize a standard place within the Council, since it is a very delicate subject and a few [member states] would possibly odor a possible threat to turn into the following ‘sufferer’ of such a process themselves,” he stated.

And diplomats from two international locations that are usually fairly hawkish on rule-of-law points agreed.

‘Lame-duck presidency’

“I do not see any help for this within the Council,” one of many diplomats stated, talking on situation of anonymity.

“Then you might be on [a] slippery slope in relation to the entire construction of the rotating EU presidency,” they added.

The second EU diplomat stated: “It is not going to go wherever … we’ll simply should pinch our noses for just a few months”.

“Let’s not overestimate the presidency’s impression on EU coverage. They [Hungary] cannot do as they please and can be pushed apart by bigger member states in the event that they have been to misbehave badly,” he stated.

“Extra importantly, Hungary involves the presidency at a time [after the EU elections in June] when there may be little or no coverage to information by way of Council. The brand new EU Fee will solely come into energy by 1 December, so this can be a lame-duck presidency anyway”, he added.