[ad_1]
The Muslim aspect filed an attraction within the Supreme Court docket towards the Gyanvapi verdict given by the Allahabad Excessive Court docket. The Excessive Court docket had, earlier within the day, dismissed the Gyanvapi mosque administration committee’s twin appeals.
The appeals have been, in flip, directed towards a Varanasi district court docket’s resolution to allow puja in a cellar within the mosque complicated.
On January 17, the Varanasi district decide had appointed the district Justice of the Peace because the receiver of the southern cellar of the mosque. On January 31, the Varanasi district court docket dominated {that a} priest can carry out prayers earlier than the idols within the southern cellar of the mosque.
Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, whereas dismissing each the appeals of the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid (AIM), stated in his order: “After going by way of the whole data of the case and after contemplating arguments of the events involved, the court docket didn’t discover any floor to intervene within the judgement handed by the Varanasi district decide.”
The AIM had filed the attraction within the excessive court docket on February 1 quickly after the Supreme Court docket had refused to listen to the mosque committee’s plea towards the order permitting the puja within the southern cellar.
Varanasi district decide Dr AK Vishwesha had allowed the puja within the southern cellar on the plea of Shailendra Kumar Pathak ‘Vyas’, a member of the Vyas household which had the cellar in its possession and had been conducting the puja inside it till 1993. He had stated the “puja” was stopped in the course of the tenure of then Uttar Pradesh chief minister Mulayam Singh Yadav after the Babri masjid in Ayodhya was demolished on December 6, 1992.
The AIM had challenged the stand of the Vyas household and claimed that the southern cellar being on mosque premises was in its possession and that nether the Vyas household nor anybody else had the best to carry out puja inside it. It had additionally stated that no idols existed within the cellar and therefore, there was no query of prayers being provided there until 1993. The petitioner had claimed that his household had the management of the cellar even in the course of the British rule.
A survey carried out by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) on the court docket’s order had prompt that the mosque was constructed throughout Mughal emperor Aurangzeb’s rule over the stays of a Hindu temple.
[ad_2]
Source link
