It’s a myth that England was created on the battlefield – most of it happened at the negotiating table

The story of the making of England is commonly represented as a battleground between the English and the Vikings, with waves of plunder, conquest and fight. Of the a number of English kingdoms, just one, Wessex (primarily based in south-west England), led by Alfred the Nice, stopped a terrific Viking military in its tracks by warfare within the 870s.

Alfred the Nice’s grandson Athelstan then secured the way forward for England by successful the Battle of Brunanburh in opposition to a coalition of Vikings and Scots in 937.

This “kings and battles” narrative is nicely established, however the story is skewed by the propaganda of medieval royals. Tales are vital, as a result of our views of the previous form perceptions of contemporary battle and identities.

The lesser identified a part of the creation of England is that it required the suppression of as soon as impartial kingdoms that pre-dated the Viking Age. Additionally, shut studying of the Anglo Saxon Chronicle which is our most important supply for English historical past on this interval, means that integration and negotiation have been extra vital within the making of England than battles and bloodshed.

Arguably, the creation of England was not a easy ethnic battle between the English and Vikings however an influence seize by Wessex, clothed within the garb of saving individuals from “international” oppression.

There’s proof that folks dwelling on the time noticed occasions extra when it comes to regional identities than ethnic binaries. Nevertheless, the principle surviving written sources, (such because the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle), have been composed beneath Wessex’s affect and due to this fact give a one-sided view.

Difficult ethnic identities

From the reign of Alfred to Aethelstan, the ability of the dominion of Wessex progressively prolonged over the previous kingdoms of Mercia (roughly the trendy Midlands), East Anglia and Northumbria. Every of those kingdoms had been settled by Vikings from the 860s.

We see regional names “Northumbria” and “East Anglia” used within the Anglo Saxon Chronicle to explain armies led by Vikings from the 890s. This means that a couple of many years after Vikings settled, they have been recognized by the English areas by which they lived. These regional armies presumably mixed locals and newcomers. The Vikings have been going “native” and a brand new tradition mixing Anglo-Scandinavian identities developed in areas beneath their management.

An English identification was not a barrier to main vikings and vice versa. That is illustrated after the dying of Alfred the Nice when the rule of his son Edward was disputed by a cousin, Æthelwold. Æthelwold led mixed armies together with vikings, however his riot was crushed.

In 918, the Mercian Register reviews that the Viking leaders of York have been prepared to pledge obedience to Æthelflæd, chief of English Mercia shortly earlier than she died.

When Edward seized management of Mercia from Æthelflæd’s daughter, it could have provoked dissent, with a riot in opposition to him reported on the finish of his reign. This isn’t a lot an ethnic battle as reluctance of impartial kingdoms to be united beneath the male line of Alfred the Nice.

Within the mid-ninth century, the phrase Angelcynn (actually “Anglian-kin”) seems in charters as an equal to gens Anglorum (Latin for “English-speaking individuals”). The title was promoted within the Viking Age as a unifying label for the peoples of Wessex and Mercia.

Ethnic labelling was vital to legitimise new constructions of energy and to generate a way of loyalty. Englishness was an identification that folks might decide into, even with Scandinavian heritage.

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle linked the family tree of Wessex rulers to the Danish royal line. This helped legitimise English management over Viking held areas and develop a way of shared historical past.

Forging a brand new English identification

Historically historical past has been seen to be formed by decisive conflicts. However England was solid on the negotiating desk greater than on the battlefield. In relation to Alfred the Nice of Wessex and his successors in creating an English kingdom, essentially the most important conflicts are seen as Edington (878) and Brunanburh (937).

Edington was a big victory for Alfred because it introduced the Viking chief Guthrum into an settlement which included his baptism. Relatively than being pressured, Guthrum’s baptism could have served an agenda to construct hyperlinks with the church in his new kingdom. Guthrum continued to rule East Anglia till his dying in 890.

Brunanburh is typically hailed as one of many best English victories as Athelstan led the boys of Wessex and Mercia to victory in opposition to a coalition of Vikings, Scots and Britons. Nevertheless, the battle was removed from decisive.

When Athelstan died two years later, Northumbria got here again beneath Viking management. It was the Northumbrian’s expulsion of their final viking king Erik in 954 and acceptance of the Wessex king Eadred that marked a last chapter within the unification of England.

From 878 to 954, the Anglo Saxon Chronicle recorded many battles but additionally many peace treaties and submissions. Peace treaties have been usually short-lived however they have been vital in limiting bloodshed and sustaining strains of communication between rival teams.

It was solely as soon as the boundaries of the English kingdom have been efficiently expanded (a non-linear course of which ran from 927 till 954) that royal diplomas started to make use of derogatory phrases, resembling “barbarian” to explain non-English, together with viking, customs to advertise conformity.

From 980 a brand new wave of Scandinavian assaults shook England culminating within the reign of a Scandinavian king Cnut. This threatened the Wessex line beneath king Aethelred and as he started shedding his grip on energy, ethnic scapegoating of Danebecame a brand new tactic in a bid to unite his topics.

In 1002, “the king ordered to be slain all of the Danish males who have been in England… On St Brice’s Day (13 November) as a result of it was made identified to the king that they treacherously needed to deprive him after which all his counsellors of life and to own this kingdom thereafter.” Other than a couple of notable examples, resembling a recorded bloodbath at Oxford, the order doesn’t appear to have been enthusiastically adopted. The usage of persecution as a political weapon failed.

Whereas historians are inclined to reward the deeds of kings and victorious battles, the work of creating England was executed by many years lengthy integration and negotiation, swallowing as soon as impartial kingdoms into a brand new political actuality. It was solely on the finish of this course of {that a} narrative of ethnic battle between English and vikings grew to become a part of our nationwide story.

Searching for one thing good? Lower by the noise with a fastidiously curated collection of the newest releases, reside occasions and exhibitions, straight to your inbox each fortnight, on Fridays. Join right here.